Navigation
Page Summary
the-xtina.livejournal.com - (no subject)
cinnabarine.livejournal.com - (no subject)
oneagain.livejournal.com - (no subject)
signsoflife.livejournal.com - (no subject)
nitouche.livejournal.com - (no subject)
dpolicar - (no subject)
cuthalion.livejournal.com - (no subject)
cuthalion.livejournal.com - (no subject)
spike.livejournal.com - (no subject)
roy-batty.livejournal.com - (no subject)
hitchhiker.livejournal.com - (no subject)
liminal-spaces.livejournal.com - (no subject)
veek.livejournal.com - (no subject)
crouchback.livejournal.com - (no subject)
qwrrty.livejournal.com - (no subject)
weegoddess.livejournal.com - (no subject)
Style Credit
- Base style: Heads Up by
- Theme: A Brighter View by and
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2009-05-14 03:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-14 03:45 pm (UTC)It only took a few seconds for me to shift to hearing "Milkshake" in my head with camel back-up singers.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-14 03:53 pm (UTC)Also...
My hump, my hump. My hump, my hump, my hump. My hump, my hump. My lovely lady lumps.
*smacks ass*
no subject
Date: 2009-05-14 03:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-14 03:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-14 04:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-14 04:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-14 04:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-14 05:05 pm (UTC)You're left with the sense that it was meant as a compliment, but really, not so much.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-14 07:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-21 08:19 am (UTC)Great, now *that* song is in my head.
::grumblegrumbleculturalliteracy::
no subject
Date: 2009-05-14 04:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-14 04:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-14 04:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-14 05:02 pm (UTC)Or else the other way around --
I'm never sure. Are you?
Edit: ah; I got it wrong, but close. Original here.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-14 04:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-14 04:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-14 04:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-14 04:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-14 04:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-14 04:50 pm (UTC)B and b are the same letter, and Б and б are the same letter.
Τ, Т, and T are all different letters, though they look the same (sometimes! lowercase they're: τ, т, t)
Don't ask me for any rules though. I would call the Norwegian B and the English B the same letter, even though the Norwegian alphabet has a few more letters, and I'd even call the German V and English V the same letter even though they're pronounced differently. And don't even get me started on Vietnamese (seriously: don't)
Living Dangerously
Date: 2009-05-14 05:04 pm (UTC)Re: Living Dangerously
Date: 2009-05-14 05:46 pm (UTC)Re: Living Dangerously
Date: 2009-05-14 07:58 pm (UTC)Re: Living Dangerously
Date: 2009-05-14 08:11 pm (UTC)Check out this amazingly cool explanation of their (designed) alphabet. Which does not explain my confusion, but still.
Re: Living Dangerously
Date: 2009-05-14 08:22 pm (UTC)Re: Living Dangerously
Date: 2009-05-14 08:23 pm (UTC)sorry about that!
Re: Living Dangerously
Date: 2009-05-14 08:31 pm (UTC)Re: Living Dangerously
Date: 2009-05-14 08:24 pm (UTC)Re: Living Dangerously
Date: 2009-05-15 05:03 am (UTC)Their orthography is terrible. It was invented by French missionaries, and is based on the Roman alphabet. But it's got lots of sounds that aren't in French or other roman-alphabet-using languages. So they have nine different diacritics you can put on a vowel, about half of which are tone and half are sound, and you can mix them to make 72 different vowel glyphs. And of course the vowels don't really have the same vowel quality once you've started messing with the tones so it's all kind of approximations anyway. The consonants aren't much better - with the struck-through Ds (almost typeable!) and a bunch of pure consonants are represented by digraphs which don't correlate at all to what those digraphs sound like in other languages (TR -> some retroflex t). Plus the last letter of a syllable is often silent.
And then between the vowels and consonants they even get their spaces wrong! There's spaces between every syllable and as a result they'll claim that each one is its on word and they don't have polysyllabic words at all, but there's compound words (still with spaces between the parts) and sometimes one part of the "compound word" doesn't mean anything on its own and can't occur with any other words.
So anyway: Thanks a fucking lot, French missionaries!
no subject
Date: 2009-05-14 04:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-14 04:14 pm (UTC)Bactrian camel is bihumpal.
Totally unhelpful mean antimnemonic:
dromedary camel has deux humps.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-14 04:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-14 06:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-14 04:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-14 05:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-14 07:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-14 06:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-14 07:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-14 07:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-14 07:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-14 09:10 pm (UTC)Thanks, I think.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-14 09:19 pm (UTC)It didn't even occur to me that these words might actually apply to camels IRL. I thought they were mathematical terms.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-14 10:03 pm (UTC)By sheer coincidence, I am listening to a series of lectures about the Hellenistic world, and today's bit was about the Hellenistic Bactrian kingdom.
Also, I hate you, Milkman Molly! But that will probably wear off when I stop thinking about that bloody song.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-15 01:33 am (UTC)(dum diddly dum diddly dum diddly)
no subject
Date: 2009-05-21 08:21 am (UTC)Oh, and also, YAY! Happy happy day!