ext_153445 ([identity profile] harimad.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] moominmolly 2009-11-06 04:45 pm (UTC)

I can't use a different term, those are the data that I'm reporting.

Why do you consider that term (or is it the data, I can't tell) intellectually dishonest? I can see how another datum would more useful in some contexts, but not how this datum (or term?) is dishonest.

rezendi, if you made it past one year life expectancy goes up. Past five years, up again. Past 60, way up again.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting