For the love of intellectual honesty, please don't use the term "life expectancy at birth". It's a meaningless statistically-derived value, like trying to tie heart-attack rate to blue-jean-wearing rate (which, btw, aligns quite nicely).
Better determinants would be the separated values for "live births that live to age 12" and "average life-expectancy from age 12".
no subject
Better determinants would be the separated values for "live births that live to age 12" and "average life-expectancy from age 12".